Guest jhilliard Posted October 11, 2004 Posted October 11, 2004 Can anyone tell me if there is benchmarking data out there for me to compare fees/expense of a DB plan to the marketplace. I am trying to determine if the actuarial fees, recordkeeping, reporting and investment expenses are competitive. Thanks.
Dougsbpc Posted October 11, 2004 Posted October 11, 2004 I'm not sure there is a standard, and fees may vary in defferent regions of the country. Here is what we charge: Base Fee...........................................$1,300 Per Participant.......................................$45 Per hr. Trust Accounting........................$100 Per hr. Non discrim testing.....................$100 Per Partic distribution............................$110 Per Plan amendment..............................$100 Per Participant Loan...............................$100 Plan Document (one time fee)..............$1,050 The above generally includes everything other than QDRO's and plan termination fees. We do not sell investments. We find most other firms in our area have comparable fees with some higher and some lower.
Kirk Maldonado Posted October 11, 2004 Posted October 11, 2004 Dougsbpc: Are you sure that there are no anti-trust concerns with posting your company's schedue of fees on a public forum? (I honestly don't know the answer to that question, but I would be leary about posting such information.) Kirk Maldonado
Ron Snyder Posted October 11, 2004 Posted October 11, 2004 I would think that the problem could occur in providing the information through means other than a public forum. Many firms, such as my own, post their fees on their websites, so they are public information. I know of no such benchmarks of DB fees. However the fee schedule posted by Dougsbpc seem quite high to me (45-52% higher than ours).
Kirk Maldonado Posted October 11, 2004 Posted October 11, 2004 vebaguru: You are absolutely correct, the problem may arise in other contexts. I just thought that the risk of there being a problem (if there is one) would be exacerbated where the information is shared in a public forum populated by actual or potential competitors. I want to emphasize that my knowledge of anti-trust law is very, very limited. Kirk Maldonado
Effen Posted October 12, 2004 Posted October 12, 2004 Interesting... However the fee schedule posted by Dougsbpc seem quite high to me (45-52% higher than ours). I was thinking just to opposite. Dougsbpc seemed pretty low to me. I think the service is worth a lot more, but then again, its worth whatever someone will pay. The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
david rigby Posted October 12, 2004 Posted October 12, 2004 I'm with Kirk on this one. BenefitsLink is too valuable as an information sharing resource to taint it with any hint that might be interpreted in a negative light. If you want to share your fees, do it on your website or in other literature, but please not here. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Lynn Campbell Posted October 12, 2004 Posted October 12, 2004 I feel bad that Dougsbpc is getting heat on this - I suspect that he/she is just trying to be helpful to other users of Benefits link - rather than trying to cause any problems. Also, I think it's impossible to say if fees are low or high without knowing what size plan we are talking about and exactly what the services entail, right? Does everyone agree that comparing fees is taboo?
AndyH Posted October 12, 2004 Posted October 12, 2004 Suffice it to say that Doug meant well and there are some here who object to such information being posted, so we'll end it there. ASPA undertook a survey a couple of months ago that covered such items so they may have this information available for purchase some time in the not too distant future.
Belgarath Posted October 12, 2004 Posted October 12, 2004 FWIW - I also know nothing whatsoever about antitrust law, but I can tell you that one of my associates attended some conference (don't know which one) with a lot of other TPA's at some point during the last 3 months. They specifically were told not to discuss fees due to antitrust concerns.
david rigby Posted October 12, 2004 Posted October 12, 2004 And we are cautioned not to discuss fees when attending actuarial conferences. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Dougsbpc Posted October 12, 2004 Posted October 12, 2004 I appologize for posting these fees. I had no intention of doing anything other than answering the question. Perhaps I should have tried to get an email address and follwed it up with "here is what some administrators charge". We do the vast majority of our work locally and have no desire for any new business that does not come to us through local CPA's etc.
AndyH Posted October 12, 2004 Posted October 12, 2004 Well, we all learned that Effen is ridiculously overpriced p.s. I object to these objections on the grounds that they are inadmissable hearsay!
Blinky the 3-eyed Fish Posted October 12, 2004 Posted October 12, 2004 His Effen fees are a joke! "What's in the big salad?" "Big lettuce, big carrots, tomatoes like volleyballs."
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now