Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Why? Did you tell sponsor the opposite?

Before hand-wringing, don't forget to look at the dollar impact. If the unvested amounts are not much, then don't consider it the end of the world. Perhaps a viable perspecitve is to communicate to the EEs: "although we were not required to vest these amounts, we did so anyway...."

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Posted

Stephen's answer should have been "not necessarily". It depends on (1) the documentation of the merger, and (2) the facts and circumstances (partial termination, curtailment) surrounding the plan merger.

As to what to tell the client, I would look him right in the eye and assure him that your E&O is up to date. ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use