bzorc Posted November 8, 2004 Posted November 8, 2004 A doctor owns 100% of his own medical practice. He also owns 100% of a business in a non-medical field. Does this constitute a controlled group? Thanks for any responses.
K-t-F Posted November 8, 2004 Posted November 8, 2004 The fact that the two businesses are not in the same field (i.e. medical practice and sells car batteries) does not make a difference.... he "controls" both companies by virture of his percentage of ownership. Its not easy being green
bzorc Posted November 8, 2004 Author Posted November 8, 2004 I agree. Now suppose the medical practice, consisting solely of the doctor, has adopted a profit sharing plan. I would think that the non-medical company would have to adopt the plan as well, and cover the employees that meet the eligibility requirements. Is that a correct assumption? Thanks again.
Belgarath Posted November 8, 2004 Posted November 8, 2004 Not necessarily. You have to include them for nondiscrimination testing purposes. Suppose the medical company has 15 employees, all of whom are covered. If the nonmedical company has only 5 employees, then they could be excluded and you'd still pass your 70% test. Of course, in real life the situation is usually exaclty the opposite. They want to cover the business with the owner and spouse, and exclude everyone else!
Effen Posted November 8, 2004 Posted November 8, 2004 Now suppose the medical practice, consisting solely of the doctor, has adopted a profit sharing plan - no way that flys unless the other group has some sort of qualified plan, and even then, you would need to prove that you weren't discriminating. The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
Belgarath Posted November 8, 2004 Posted November 8, 2004 I didn't focus on the words "consisting solely of the doctor." I was thinking more in general terms, as you can see by my example. So I agree with Effen!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now