Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest t936
Posted

A plan sponsor is switching from a Final Average Pay Plan to a Career Average Pay Plan in the middle of a Plan Year (5/31 for a calendar year plan). My question pertains to the 401(a)(17) compensation cap. Is it permissible to use the following approach:

Final Average Pay Benefit = Use full $210,000 comp cap but employees would only be credited with 5/12 of a year of service (service completed before amendment). So an HCE over the comp cap would receive $210,000 X benefit formula X 5/12.

Career Average Benefit = Prorate $210,000 comp cap to 7/12 for partial year. So an HCE over the comp cap would receive $122,500 ($210,000 X 7/12) X plan formula

Is there any guidance on this type of situation or would a private letter ruling be the only method by which to obtain comfort?

Posted

The change in plan provisions can be handled many different ways, so it's a matter of the intent of the amendment and the current document provisions. Are you intending with wear-away or without wear-away (or with extended wear-away, but no one chooses that)? How is a year of benefit service credited? 1,000 hours? You just need to make sure that there is no 411(d)(6) violation.

So for example if a year of benefit service is 1,000 hours and someone had compensation of $210,000 and 1,000 hours at 5/31, you would need to grandfather a whole year of benefit service and the full $210,000 to avoid a cutback.

"What's in the big salad?"

"Big lettuce, big carrots, tomatoes like volleyballs."

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I'm not sure your plan change requires you to grandfather a "whole year of benefit service to avoid a cutback." The accrued benefit at the change (later of effective date or adoption date) is what must be provided as a minimum. The plan amendment will (should) include that provision. Blinky's suggestion may provide the same result, but the testing is done on the benefits, not the service or the comp.

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use