Guest merlin Posted June 17, 2005 Posted June 17, 2005 Should the OYTC be calculated on the full face amount of the insurance or on the net amount at risk (FA-CV)?
david rigby Posted June 17, 2005 Posted June 17, 2005 Although this is not my usual type of client, I thought the term cost is just that, the cost. Determine all liabilities; determine all assets. Combining them is what makes a funding method. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Guest merlin Posted June 21, 2005 Posted June 21, 2005 I've seen it done both ways. Any reason for the full FA rather than the NAAR?
Guest Roman Posted June 21, 2005 Posted June 21, 2005 I have always seen it as having the CV as part of the assets and then valuing the term cost as qx times the Face amount.
SoCalActuary Posted June 22, 2005 Posted June 22, 2005 My experience is that the plan death benefit definition determines the method. If the benefit is only the face amt, or PVAB if greater, then the NAAR is the basis for the term cost. If the benefit is face, plus PVAB - CV, then use the full face for the term cost.
Guest merlin Posted June 23, 2005 Posted June 23, 2005 Great answer,SoCal. Thank you and all other responders very much.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now