dmb Posted July 1, 2005 Posted July 1, 2005 After calculating 50% of the value of a Joint & 2/3 Survivor benefit currently in pay status, there is a question as to how the value of the former spouse's benefit should be converted to an annuity (as a reduction to the participant's benefit), as a life annuity or a J & 2/3 S annuity. The argument has been made that since the survivor benefit was accounted for in the 50% calc that the conversion should be done using a life only factor. the argument also has been made that since the benefit is a J&S benefit, it should be converted using the J&S factor. Does anyone have a definitive answer?? Please let me know if more details are necessary. Thanks.
Effen Posted July 1, 2005 Posted July 1, 2005 50% of the value of a Joint & 2/3 Survivor benefit currently in pay status By this statement I assume the benefit is in pay status, and therefore, I would argue that there should be no "conversion" of any sort. If she is entitled to 50%, then you just take 50% of each payment and give it too her. If she dies first, the 50% you were giving her can revert back to him. If he dies first, she should get 2/3 of the original benefit. The form of payment has been elected and normally can't be changed. You need to work within the Plan provisions which probably don't allow a second bite at the benefit election apple. Otherwise you have adverse selection problems. The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
QDROphile Posted July 9, 2005 Posted July 9, 2005 Since plans usually do not allow benefits to be reformed after the benefit starting date, I generally agree with Effen. But I can see an argument that the AP should get more or less than 50% of each payment while the participant is alive, depending on how one values the benefit now. The value of the death benefit that the AP will get (assuming survival) may be a reason why the AP should not get 50% of each payment otherwise scheduled to go to the participant. Perhaps the AP should get less than 50% if you are trying to redivide the value of the benefit to provide 50% of the value of the entire benefit to each while staying within the confines of the form of benefit in place.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now