Guest HelpINeedSomeBody Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 It is my understanding that receipt of Social Security Disability Income payments automically enrolls the individual in Medicare Part A coverage. Part B coverage may be waived, but Part A coverage cannot be waived by individuals that are eligible for coverage due to age and disability. Thus, if a Plan so provides, would it be appropriate to terminate COBRA coverage to an individual that is receiving SSDI because the are "entitled" (actually automically enrolled) to Medicare? All thoughts appreciated.
Guest b2kates Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 no, a disabled individual is not eligible for Medicare until 29 months of disability; ergo the 29 month COBRA disability extension.
Kirk Maldonado Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 While that is correct, the trouble is that the person automatically becomes entitled to Medicare at the end of the 29 months and cannot stop that from occurring (with the resultant loss of COBRA coverage) unless he or she repays all of the monthly disability benefits that he or she already received. In virtually all cases, that repayment is impossible. Kirk Maldonado
Guest HelpINeedSomeBody Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 Doesn't the automtic enrollment in Part A occur after receiving SSDI for 24 months? I realize the disability COBRA extension coverage period is 29 months. I always thought that these time periods were coordinated and was a little confused when I read this, and thus, my posting of the question.
Guest b2kates Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 remember that SSDI will not start until after 5 months of disability 5 month wait plus 24 months = 29 months
Guest HelpINeedSomeBody Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 Ah, didn't realize the 5 month wait....now what I thought I knew all makes sense again.
Don Levit Posted September 29, 2005 Posted September 29, 2005 I have a client who had an individual BCBS policy. When she was officially declared "disabled," by Medicare, after 2 years of disability, she enrolled in Medicare, including Part B. I received a letter from BCBS that Medicare was the primary payer. From that experience, I reasoned that one could indeed have Medicare and another policy in force. What really upset me was that even though BCBS acknowledged in writing that Medicare was primary, they would not lower my client's premium, due to their lower amount at risk. Don Levit
Guest b2kates Posted September 29, 2005 Posted September 29, 2005 Don, your situation may have been because it was an individual policy. For group policies Medicare is, with certain exceptions, always secondary.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now