Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Can someone help me determine if I am reading the definition of "de-identified information" correctly? Reg. 164.514(b)(2)(i)© seems to provide that it is OK to not remove an individual's year of birth in creating de-identified information. In other words, it looks like a de-identified record could not include an exact birthdate, e.g. 1/1/1973, but could show the year of birth, e.g. 1973. Any thoughts?

Guest b2kates
Posted

generally, I agree, but watch out that the individual year is unique and thereby identifies an individual; i.e. the only person born in 1985 is .....

we watched this situation with respect to zip code sorting also.

Posted

I agree with b2kates.

I don't have the regs in front of me, but I also believe there is an age limit (i.e., you couldn't provide a date of birth that indicated the individual was over 89...or something).

I could be mistaken, however.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use