J2D2 Posted October 26, 2005 Posted October 26, 2005 Can someone help me determine if I am reading the definition of "de-identified information" correctly? Reg. 164.514(b)(2)(i)© seems to provide that it is OK to not remove an individual's year of birth in creating de-identified information. In other words, it looks like a de-identified record could not include an exact birthdate, e.g. 1/1/1973, but could show the year of birth, e.g. 1973. Any thoughts?
Guest b2kates Posted October 26, 2005 Posted October 26, 2005 generally, I agree, but watch out that the individual year is unique and thereby identifies an individual; i.e. the only person born in 1985 is ..... we watched this situation with respect to zip code sorting also.
Steve72 Posted October 26, 2005 Posted October 26, 2005 I agree with b2kates. I don't have the regs in front of me, but I also believe there is an age limit (i.e., you couldn't provide a date of birth that indicated the individual was over 89...or something). I could be mistaken, however.
J2D2 Posted October 26, 2005 Author Posted October 26, 2005 Both of you raise excellent points. Thank you.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now