Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest muskyrod
Posted

I would like to know the answer to this question as well.

Posted

Subsection (g)(2) of the proposed regulations appears to say that there is no delay (see language in parenthesis), but the "separation from service" is defined as including death, so it could be interpreted in a circular manner. Any thoughts are appreciated.

Thanks.

Posted

I read 409A as saying the delay is 6 months beyond the later of separation of service or death. I think the proposed regs reinforce the point by including death in the definition of separation of service. I think of this as the "suicide clause" - if you're fired for being indicted, you have to wait 6 months, but commit suicide and you get paid right away. However, I've had one attorney tell me I'm wrong. Hope that helps.

 - There are two types of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data sets...

Guest LeeNunn
Posted

Here's the text from 409A

In the case of any specified employee, the requirement of subparagraph (A)(i) is met only if distributions may not be made before the date which is 6 months after the date of separation from service (or, if earlier, the date of death of the employee).

Most practitioners have interpreted this to mean that distributions can be made at the earlier of death or six months after the date of separation from service.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use