Guest Texas_Acty Posted November 23, 2005 Posted November 23, 2005 Consider: MVA=market asset value AVA=actuarial asset value t=0 is beginning of year 0 t=1 is beginning of year 1 A=MVA @t=1 B=MVA @t=0 C=Assets purchased during year 0 to 1 D=Assets sold during year 0 to 1 E/(E)=Appreciation/(depreciation) from 0 to 1= A-B-C+D F/(F)=Appreciation/(depreciation) carried forward from 0 to 1 abs=absolute value operation AVA @1 = MVA @1 + Min{abs[(E)+(F)], Max(20% x abs[(E)+(F)], 1% x MVA @1)} where the 80%/120% corridor around MVA applies i.e., MVA is increased by an adjustment for net depreciation or decreased by an adjustment for net appreciation In words, MVA is increased by the smaller of (i) 20% of the net depreciation, or (ii) 1% of the MVA @1, but the increase can be no larger than 100% of the net depreciation, with the overall result constrained by the 80/120 corridor. Is this method reasonable under the asset valuation method regulation? Comments? Votes? Reasons?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now