Randy Watson Posted December 24, 2005 Posted December 24, 2005 Is it premissible to exclude leased employees from the tests under Section 105? They are not specifically mentioned in the regs, but I was wondering whether there was anything out there that includes or excludes them. Thanks.
Kirk Maldonado Posted December 24, 2005 Posted December 24, 2005 My recollection is that the section 105(h) regulations predate the enactment of the leased employee ruels. Kirk Maldonado
Guest b2kates Posted December 24, 2005 Posted December 24, 2005 I do not believe that Code Section 105 was conformed to adopt the definitions in Code Section 414(n); therefore, leased employees would be excluded from the 105(h) testing; but be careful that they do not fall within the independent contractor rules that would catagorize them as employees.
leevena Posted December 27, 2005 Posted December 27, 2005 If you are leasing employees, they are not yours...correct? If they are not yours, why would you worry about 105?
GBurns Posted December 27, 2005 Posted December 27, 2005 That is the big problem .. Who is the employer? Are you the common law employer? Are you a "co-employer"? What is "leased"? Some people have different meanings to the term "leased". Are these through a "temp" agency such as Kelly or are they through a PEO? How long are they/have they been "leased"? Who issues the W2? You might need some more clarification as to what their status is, so as to make a better decision. George D. Burns Cost Reduction Strategies Burns and Associates, Inc www.costreductionstrategies.com(under construction) www.employeebenefitsstrategies.com(under construction)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now