Guest Texas_Acty Posted February 15, 2006 Posted February 15, 2006 I seem to recollect the general vesting requirements in the event of a standard plan termination as follows: (1) All participants required to be deemed vested if the sponsor receives or expects to receive a reversion. (2) Vesting not required otherwise (except that the normal vesting rules would still apply, of course). Question: Is this accurate? Or, must all participants be vested no matter the other facts of the case? (i.e., standard with reversion and standard without)
WDIK Posted February 15, 2006 Posted February 15, 2006 I believe that potential reversion issue is applicable in a partial termination scenario, not in a standard termination. See Regulation 1.411(d)-2. ...but then again, What Do I Know?
Effen Posted February 15, 2006 Posted February 15, 2006 Lots of prior threads on this topic that you should probably read. My personal opinion is that anyone who has not had a break s/b 100% vested. Some people argue 5 breaks, some say only those who were actually active at the time the plan terminated. If you submit for approval, the IRS will probably ask about anyone who termed during the last 5 years so be ready to defend what ever your client chooses to do. The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
JAY21 Posted February 16, 2006 Posted February 16, 2006 Amen to what Effen said. We've had the IRS try to apply the 5 year approach but have been succesful in arguing for a 1-year break in service approach. I think there is an old IRS memorandum (or something like that) from the national office that supported the 1-year approach. I think we hauled that out and waived it around and presumably that helped our case.
Guest flogger Posted February 16, 2006 Posted February 16, 2006 We have had success in pacifying the IRS on their the 5-yr break in service restiction-- The IRS has told me that their reason for requiring full vesting for any participant who has not yet incurred the 5-yr BinS is that the sponsor could rehire any one of those people and they would then have all their vesting restored, and should be entitled to 100% because the termination. To counter this, we have provided the IRS, on two different termination cases, a signed letter from the sponsor stating that under no circumstances will they rehire any terminated plan participant.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now