mal Posted February 24, 2006 Posted February 24, 2006 Money purchase plan is holding retirement accounts on a handful of deferred, vested participants. All of these individuals are likely in their 80's by now. An IRS letter forwarding request was made, but generated only one response. Death audits have turned up nothing. The Plan is silent on forfeitures. Do we make an amendment to the Plan and treat these accounts as forfeited (unless the participants resurface)? 1.411(a)-4 seems to open the door to this possibility. Is it any "safer" for the Plan to turn the money over to the state? Ideally, the Plan would like to continue to hold the money...if it goes to the state the money will eventually be forfeited. Thanks for your input.
Guest mjb Posted February 24, 2006 Posted February 24, 2006 Most state agencies that supervise abandoned property will not accept distributions of missing participants benefits from ERISA plans because state laws on abandoned property are preempted by ERISA. The plan could be amended to provide that the benefits of participants who cannot be located are forfeited subject to reinstatment if the participant or beneficary appears at a later time.
Ron Snyder Posted February 24, 2006 Posted February 24, 2006 I have never seen a case where a state's unclaimed property statute was pre-empted by ERISA.
Guest mjb Posted February 27, 2006 Posted February 27, 2006 Manfuacturer's Life Ins Co. v. East Bay Restaurant and Tavern Ret. Plan, 57 FSupp2d 921 (CA); Commonwealth Edison v. Vega, 174 Fed 3d 870 (IL); DOL Op. 94-41 (TX)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now