Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Money purchase plan is holding retirement accounts on a handful of deferred, vested participants. All of these individuals are likely in their 80's by now. An IRS letter forwarding request was made, but generated only one response. Death audits have turned up nothing.

The Plan is silent on forfeitures. Do we make an amendment to the Plan and treat these accounts as forfeited (unless the participants resurface)? 1.411(a)-4 seems to open the door to this possibility.

Is it any "safer" for the Plan to turn the money over to the state? Ideally, the Plan would like to continue

to hold the money...if it goes to the state the money will eventually be forfeited.

Thanks for your input.

Posted

Most state agencies that supervise abandoned property will not accept distributions of missing participants benefits from ERISA plans because state laws on abandoned property are preempted by ERISA. The plan could be amended to provide that the benefits of participants who cannot be located are forfeited subject to reinstatment if the participant or beneficary appears at a later time.

Posted

I have never seen a case where a state's unclaimed property statute was pre-empted by ERISA.

Posted

Manfuacturer's Life Ins Co. v. East Bay Restaurant and Tavern Ret. Plan, 57 FSupp2d 921 (CA); Commonwealth Edison v. Vega, 174 Fed 3d 870 (IL); DOL Op. 94-41 (TX)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use