alexa Posted April 2, 2006 Posted April 2, 2006 We have a self-insured medical plan. An ex-Exec (who is also continuing to work for us a 1099 Consultant for a period of 5 years) is coming off COBRA As part of an agreement when he terminated employment, lifetime health benefits to he & his spouse on same conditions as a continuing active Exec were promised in wriiting The COBRA 18 month period saved us from having to search for other medical coverage equivalent to our current group plan Our benefits attorney recommended not continuing him on our self-insured plan for discrimination reasons under 105(h) He turns age 65 end of this year. We have a fully-insured retiree plan we can put him on then but problem is spouse is only 56 and can't join that plan until she is Medicare eligible, basically another 9 years Am finding it difficult to get group coverage for just 1 inviidual. Individual conversion plans don't have RX coverage or medical coverage similar to group plan is really hadr to match. Am looking at executive supplemental medical reimbursement insurancepolicy to suppllement How have others handled this situation?
GBurns Posted April 2, 2006 Posted April 2, 2006 Did this attorney specify what the 105(h) problems would be? I also wonder about your retiree plan not being able to cover a spouse who is under 65. 1 spouse is by necessity younger than the other. Many people retire before age 65. Many people who do retire and are age 65 do have a spouse who is younger than age 65. You must have had this situation many times before, so How was it handled then? I cannot believe that this is the first age 65 retiree who has a younger spouse. George D. Burns Cost Reduction Strategies Burns and Associates, Inc www.costreductionstrategies.com(under construction) www.employeebenefitsstrategies.com(under construction)
alexa Posted April 4, 2006 Author Posted April 4, 2006 Did this attorney specify what the 105(h) problems would be?I also wonder about your retiree plan not being able to cover a spouse who is under 65. 1 spouse is by necessity younger than the other. Many people retire before age 65. Many people who do retire and are age 65 do have a spouse who is younger than age 65. You must have had this situation many times before, so How was it handled then? I cannot believe that this is the first age 65 retiree who has a younger spouse. Problem is we still have a problem since retiree himself is only 64 until 12/1 so for next 7 or 8 months must fimd soemthign else for him as well Perhaps putting him in 1 of our better fully-insured active health plans will do the trick- I am checking on that
alexa Posted April 4, 2006 Author Posted April 4, 2006 Did this attorney specify what the 105(h) problems would be? I also wonder about your retiree plan not being able to cover a spouse who is under 65. 1 spouse is by necessity younger than the other. Many people retire before age 65. Many people who do retire and are age 65 do have a spouse who is younger than age 65. You must have had this situation many times before, so How was it handled then? I cannot believe that this is the first age 65 retiree who has a younger spouse. Problem is we still have a problem since retiree himself is only 64 until 12/1 so for next 7 or 8 months must fimd soemthign else for him as well Perhaps putting him in 1 of our better fully-insured active health plans will do the trick- I am checking on that The retiree plan requires you to be eligible for Medicare Parts A &B
Guest dsilver Posted January 3, 2008 Posted January 3, 2008 Why would he be 1099'd if he was continuing to do the same work as he did when he was a full time employee?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now