Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This is somewhat related to what Sueczer posted.

We administer a 5 participant DB with 3 HCE's and 2 NHCE's. The plan has provided a benefit of 8.25% of average salary for all participants. The employer now wishes to create two groups of participants. Group A will receive 5% and group B 8.25%. The one participant in group A is a 45 year old highly compensated participant. It turns out the group A participant will be terminating employment this year. So the reduction in benefit will mean she will not accrue a benefit this year.

Is there anything wrong with doing this given:

1) A 204(h) notice was given in time (prior to 1,000 hours).

2) The plan will pass 401(a)(4).

3) The amendment was properly executed in time.

Thanks very much.

Posted

I don't see any ERISA issues given the care you have already taken.

Since you say it is an HCE, non-discrimination is no problem.

Does the employee have any other recourse, such as an employment contract?

Posted

Thanks Socal.

The employment contract does not specify anything about a promised pension benefit. Would there be anything else about an employment contract that would override the plans ability to be amended prospectively?

Posted

No. You can do what you intend with the pension.

The employment contract would only matter if it gave grounds for suit for breach of contract.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use