Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The actuary uses a specific pre-approved method in the first year of the plan.

Then for year two, the same actuary in the same firm makes a change to another pre-approved method.

As I read 2000-40, the automatic approval is ok, because there was only one change in method. The method adopted in the first plan year is not labeled a change.

Any disagreement?

Guest Steve C
Posted

That's how I read it as well. The selection of a funding method in year 1 doesn't count as a "change in method."

Posted

Gray Book 2002-14

Method Change: Automatic Approval for Plan in Effect for Fewer than Five Years

Section 6.02(3) of Rev. Proc. 2000-40 denies automatic approval for any of the funding method changes listed in Section 3 of the Rev. Proc. if a change to the same aspect of the funding method occurred during any of the prior four plan years. May a plan that has been in effect for fewer than five years change funding methods pursuant to Section 3 of Rev. Proc. 2000-40?

RESPONSE

In general, yes. The initial adoption of a funding method upon the establishment of a plan does not count as a funding method change.

However, if the plan is a continuation of another plan that was created as a result of a non-de minimis spin-off, you must consider the funding method history of the predecessor plan in determining whether or not the four-year rule is satisfied. A plan that is created as a result of a de minimis spin-off is considered a newly established plan. See section 3.03 of Rev. Proc. 2000-41.

Copyright © 2002, Enrolled Actuaries Meeting

All rights reserved by Enrolled Actuaries Meeting. Permission is granted to print or otherwise reproduce a limited number of copies of the material on the diskette for personal, internal, classroom, or other instructional use, on the condition that the foregoing copyright notice is used so as to give reasonable notice of the copyright of the Enrolled Actuaries Meeting. This consent for free limited copying without prior consent of the Enrolled Actuaries Meeting does not extend to making copies for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes, for inclusion in new collective works, or for sale or resale.

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use