mming Posted June 27, 2006 Posted June 27, 2006 A husband and wife each own 50% of Company A and there are no other employees. Company A (not the indivudual owners) owns 56% of Company B which has several employees. To me this looks like a parent-subsidiary group and a controlled group situation does not exist. However, there's been recent evidence that instead of A owning the 56% ownership in B, it's actually one of the 50% owners of A that owns 56% of B. If this is true the two companies would be classified as a brother-sister group and a controlled group situation would exist due to the attribution of spousal ownership (each spouse would be deemed to own 100% of A). Am I interpreting IRC sec. 1563(a) correctly?
Lame Duck Posted June 27, 2006 Posted June 27, 2006 For a brother sister controlled group to exist, you have to pass two tests: 1. 5 or fewer people must own at least 80% of both businees, when looking only at people who have some ownership interest in both businesses. 2. They must own more than 50% of both business when looking at identical ownership (the lowest percentage of ownership in each business. In your case, you have: A B Identical Ownership Husband or Wife 100% 56% 56% This meets the second part of the rule but not the 80% part. Based on the facts you've given, I don't see a controlled group. However, you should look into who owns the other 46% of B. There may be some required attribution between them and the husband/wife team. Additionally, any ownership that A has in B would have to be attributed to the owners of A. See 1.414©-4 (b)(4).
Nate X Posted June 27, 2006 Posted June 27, 2006 Even though the two companies are not in a control group, the 415 limit is applied as if they were since A owns > 50% of B.
Belgarath Posted June 27, 2006 Posted June 27, 2006 I agree with Nate if Corporation A actually owns 56 % of corporation B. However, your post appears to indicate that A may not own any of B, but instead, one of the owners of A also owns the 56% of B. If that's the case, then the 415 issue mentioned does not apply. This applies only to 1563(a)(1), which is parent-subsidiary only, and does not apply to a brother-sister situation.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now