Gary Posted June 30, 2006 Posted June 30, 2006 Say a self-employed individual files a Schedule C on his 1040 and sponsors a DBPP. We know that the salaries and pension expense for his employees (not counting the owner/employee) are deductions on the Schedule C and the remaining net earned income flows to the 1040 and then any pension deduction for the owner/employee is taken from the earned income that flowed through to the 1040 and shows as a qualified plan deduction on his 1040 on behalf of himself. The questions is, can his spouse in this case be considered a Schedule C employee where her salary and pension contribution is a deduction on the Schedule C or does she have to have her pension deduction from the earned income that flowed through to the owner(and spouse)/employee's 1040? Thanks.
SoCalActuary Posted June 30, 2006 Posted June 30, 2006 Either the spouse is an employee (w-2 wages, deduction on 1040 schedule C for pension), or the spouse is a partner (should have 1065 return and K-1's) or the spouse is not an eligible participant. How would you determine spouse's earned income? Is it a formula on the total net income, or a guaranteed payment in a partnership? or wages? I do not find any authority to arbitrarily divide the Sch C income between the spouses, just so you can maximize the pension deduction. I look forward to dissenting opinions, but this is the approach I hear from knowledgable tax preparers.
JAY21 Posted July 5, 2006 Posted July 5, 2006 I would agree with SoCal. If an employee need w-2 wages, FICA taxes paid, and then take her deduction on the Schedule C like any other non-owner employee. I also don't see her being an Co-Owner of a Sole Proprietorship. If it was an LLC or partnership then she could be a part owner and have earned income.
SRM Posted July 7, 2006 Posted July 7, 2006 I agree that the proper treatment is either an employee on a W-2 or partners with K-1s and an 1065 return. However, what if there were two sponsoring employers - one for each schedule c business? If we assume that the spouses have truly separate businesses, then couldn't a single Plan be adopted and sponsored by each of the schedule c businesses (i.e. 1 plan with a sponsor and a supplemental participation agreement for the other sponsor)?
SoCalActuary Posted July 7, 2006 Posted July 7, 2006 SRM - yes, your change in the scenario would work. This assumes that Gary's client has two separate businesses with their own Sch C incomes to report. However, my intuition says he has one Sch C, and is looking for ways to juice up the current contribution.
SteveH Posted August 4, 2006 Posted August 4, 2006 I am sorry this thread is a little old, but why not just add the spouse the the payroll? What is the advantage of trying to carve out her own Schedule C income? I am not seeing where there is a tax advantage by trying to avoid paying her with a W-2. Maybe if there is a lot of money involved (over the taxable wage base) that both spouses will be over. Taking that into consideration with a DB plan, if there is that much money here, I would be surprised that the client is still a Sole Prop. What am i missing?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now