Guest jamesfdavis Posted April 11, 1999 Posted April 11, 1999 Here's a story by Kathy M. Kristof in the business section of the 4/10/99 L.A. Times (www.latimes.com) on incorrect Roth conversions (i.e. too much AGI). According to Kristof's IRS source, you still may be able to recharacterize and file an amended return, even if you have already filed your regular return: "After receiving "a few hundred" tax returns in which taxpayers improperly converted traditional IRAs to Roths, the IRS says taxpayers may "re-characterize" these transactions to avoid penalties--but must do it quickly. Taxpayers may not convert a traditional IRA to a Roth in a tax year in which their income--married or single--exceeds $100,000. If they do, they are subject to income taxes and a 10% penalty on the converted amount. However, if they simply erred, they can undo the conversion--that's "re-characterization" in tax-speak--by putting the money back into a traditional IRA before Thursday's deadline, the IRS said. Taxpayers who receive a filing extension have until Aug. 15 to undo a conversion without penalty. As for the taxpayers who improperly converted Roths in filings already received by the IRS: "I can only guess that they didn't read the directions," said Don Roberts, an IRS spokesman in Washington. Taxpayers who have already filed but now realize that they were not allowed to convert their IRA should file a 1040X amended return." [This message has been edited by jamesfdavis (edited 04-10-99).]
BPickerCPA Posted April 12, 1999 Posted April 12, 1999 It's true that a taxpayer who has already filed and whose income is over $100K must recharacterize the conversion and file an amended return, this must all be done prior to 4/15/99. If you've already filed you cannot get an extension. Barry Picker, CPA/PFS, CFP New York, NY www.BPickerCPA.com
Bruce Steiner Posted April 15, 1999 Posted April 15, 1999 If you file a second return before the due date, it's not really an amended return, but rather it becomes the original return, in place of the first one. The real problem will arise in a year or two when people who thought their income was under $100,000 and converted to Roth IRAs find out on audit that their income was over $100,000. This could happen, for example, if someone is a partner in a partnership and the partnership's income is increased on audit. The proposed regulations on Roth IRAs don't offer any help. The IRS felt constrained by the statute, as amended in 1998. We'll have to wait and see if the § 1.9100 regulations offer any relief. ------------------ Bruce Steiner, attorney (212) 986-6000 (NY office) (201) 862-1080 (NJ office) also admitted in FL Bruce Steiner, attorney (212) 986-6000 also admitted in NJ and FL
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now