Guest MC2 Posted August 31, 2006 Posted August 31, 2006 Can an employee whose marital status is single designate his estate as his beneficiary for the purposes of payment of any lump sum death benefit that his beneficiary may be entitled to under the provisions of the pension plan? Thanks!
Effen Posted August 31, 2006 Posted August 31, 2006 Generally, most documents I work with state that if there is no beneficiary designation or if the beneficiaries pre-decease the participant, any death benefits are paid to the estate. Also, if the death benefit is an annuity (like the remainder of a period certain), it may cause problems for the estate; how could the estate close if it will be receiving annuity payments for the next x years? I'm not sure why you would want to designate the estate as the beneficiary. Are you asking about pre-retirement or post-retirement death benefits? The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
Guest MC2 Posted August 31, 2006 Posted August 31, 2006 Yes, I am asking about pre and post retirement death benefits.
Effen Posted August 31, 2006 Posted August 31, 2006 But why do they want to do this? What are they trying to accomplish? The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
Bird Posted August 31, 2006 Posted August 31, 2006 They might have a trust set up as part of the will and want the payouts to be handled as per the trust provisions. It's not a great idea for the reasons mentioned above. But yes, they can do it. Ed Snyder
david rigby Posted August 31, 2006 Posted August 31, 2006 But be careful. Effen is correct that many documents define a beneficiary if there is no affirmative election, but sometimes that definition will include a priority of others (spouse, children, parents, siblings, etc.) before using "estate". Thus, don't rely on the default. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
SoCalActuary Posted September 1, 2006 Posted September 1, 2006 Does this seem like a topic for the distributions or the estate planning forum?
AndyH Posted September 1, 2006 Posted September 1, 2006 SoCal I am of the opinion that you should go to those boards and stay there. Your criticizing of questions and people is getting out of hand. These questions are entirely appropriate if a db plan is involved since the death benefit rules are very different.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now