Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest lerieleech
Posted

We have a client with a DB and DC plan. The th min is provided in the DC.

The plan is top-heavy. A non-key employee participates in both plans, and works over 1000 hours each year, but does not accrue a benefit in the DB (don't ask--- long story).

Does the aforementioned non-key ee get a TH min of 3% or 5% of comp?

Guest Carol the Writer
Posted

I would say the non-key gets 5%, but then I am super-conservative about matters like this.

Guest lerieleech
Posted

Well, all that that mystery situation was is that originally the non-key ee was going to benefit in the DB plan and receive a much larger PS allocation-- large enough so that top-heavy wasn't on the front burner when the plan was set up. At the 11 5/6th hour (and this was in 2005), they decided they weren't going to benefit her in the DB, but wanted to reconsider in future years whether that would change. They also pulled the PS allocation way down, but still greater than the 5%, so it wasn't an issue at the time.

And yes, nondiscrimination passed...

Guest lerieleech
Posted
Did you also have a gateway issue for 401a4?

Good question.

Not in 2006. She is an HCE in 2006, but was an NHCE in 2005, and will again be an NHCE in 2007.

So in 2005, there was a gateway issue, as there will be in 2007.

Posted

If she is in an ineligible class in the DB plan, she is not entitled to a DB TH min; the only min she gets is the DC min...gateways aside

Posted

Gateway and combined plan nondiscrimination testing aside, if the employee in question only participates in the DC plan then that person only has to get the DC minimum of 3%. The 5% DC TH amount is if someone participates in both a DB and a DC plan and the TH min is provided in the DC plan.

Posted

How does one participate in a plan, work more than 1000 hours and not accrue a benefit? I'm willing to listen to the long story.

Guest lerieleech
Posted
How does one participate in a plan, work more than 1000 hours and not accrue a benefit? I'm willing to listen to the long story.

The short explanation is that their accrual rate, as specified in the document, is 0.

Of course, the natural question is why not just exclude them from participation? Without going into detail (and so I won't have to shoot you :)), originally the company wanted her to benefit in the DB plan. At the last minute, they decided they didn't. Even at that point, their intent was still to give her a VERY generous profit sharing allocation. So, the issue of a TH min wasn't exactly something that was on the front burner at the time.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use