lexi Posted May 10, 2007 Posted May 10, 2007 A plan excludes EE covered under a CBA. The same plan includes HCEs. Some HCEs are union members and want to participate in the union-sponsored plan. How should these people be treated for 410(b) testing purposes?
J Simmons Posted May 11, 2007 Posted May 11, 2007 Without having the benefit of the plan documents to review and study the relevant language, I would nevertheless think that the HCEs that are covered by the CBA are excluded from the non-union plan. Excluded class definitions and provisions would be redundant if they only applied to employees that were otherwise ineligible under the plan. Thus, it would seem that the excluded class provisions override and exclude those employees that would be eligible, like the HCEs, but for the excluded class provision. Extending this rationale, the otherwise eligible HCEs are excluded from the non-union plan by virtue of being covered by the CBA. As for these HCEs' participation in the union plan, as union members they are likely eligible--unless the union plan had a provision excluding HCEs. For 410(b) testing purposes of the non-union plan, the excluded employees (including these HCEs) should be able to be taken into account as non-benefiting HCEs in the minimum coverage testing. That should help or make easier passing the minimum coverage requirement. John Simmons johnsimmonslaw@gmail.com Note to Readers: For you, I'm a stranger posting on a bulletin board. Posts here should not be given the same weight as personalized advice from a professional who knows or can learn all the facts of your situation.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now