Gary Posted May 14, 2007 Posted May 14, 2007 Under PPA 2006 for the 2006 plan year. Plan has 2 participants. My understanding for a single employer DB plan is that the 404 limit is u p to 150% of current liability. My understanding for a DB plan and a stand alone 401k plan (no matches, etc.) is that the 150% current liability still applies. My understanding for a combined profit sharing, DB plan situation, the combined plan DB limit is the minimum up to 100% current liability (if greater than 25% of pay) and that a profit sharing contributes 8% of pay, subjects 2% of pay to an excise tax for 2006. Now here is where things get a little dicey for me. If we have a combined profit sharing, DB plan situation, and between 1% and 6% is contributed to the profit sharing plan then is the plan DB limit: the greater of minimum or 100% CL (assume greater than 25%) or since profit sharing contribution does not exceed 6% is the combined DB plan limit ignored and the single employer limit of 150% of CL applicable? Thanks.
John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA Posted May 14, 2007 Posted May 14, 2007 Sorry, I don't think so. Check out this post: http://benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?s...=35028&st=0
Andy the Actuary Posted May 14, 2007 Posted May 14, 2007 This particular issue was clarified by IRS Notice 2007-28 Q&A 9 which provides that the 100% rather than the 150% CL limit applies. Under PPA 2006 for the 2006 plan year. Plan has 2 participants.My understanding for a single employer DB plan is that the 404 limit is u p to 150% of current liability. My understanding for a DB plan and a stand alone 401k plan (no matches, etc.) is that the 150% current liability still applies. My understanding for a combined profit sharing, DB plan situation, the combined plan DB limit is the minimum up to 100% current liability (if greater than 25% of pay) and that a profit sharing contributes 8% of pay, subjects 2% of pay to an excise tax for 2006. Now here is where things get a little dicey for me. If we have a combined profit sharing, DB plan situation, and between 1% and 6% is contributed to the profit sharing plan then is the plan DB limit: the greater of minimum or 100% CL (assume greater than 25%) or since profit sharing contribution does not exceed 6% is the combined DB plan limit ignored and the single employer limit of 150% of CL applicable? Thanks. The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
Gary Posted May 14, 2007 Author Posted May 14, 2007 Yes, I am aware of Q-9. In one sentence it says "When employer contributions do not exceed 6% ..., the combined limit of 404a7 does not apply to employer DC contributions" So in playing devil's advocate if 404a7 does not apply perhaps we revert to single employer limit. Maybe.... I certainly see your point that the limit is probably 100% CL. To take a step back are we in agreement that if only 401k deferrals are made to a DC plan then the DB limit is the 150% limit? So the thought was that perhaps paying less than 6% to DC swas analagous to 401k deferral only plan. Thanks.
david rigby Posted May 14, 2007 Posted May 14, 2007 BTW, in case you were not aware, the Academy sent this letter to IRS w/r/t Notice 2007-28: http://www.actuary.org/pdf/pension/irs_0328.pdf I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Guest Guest_named_Howie Simon_* Posted May 15, 2007 Posted May 15, 2007 BTW, in case you were not aware, the Academy sent this letter to IRS w/r/t Notice 2007-28:http://www.actuary.org/pdf/pension/irs_0328.pdf ASPPA sent a letter to IRS yesterday and is posted to the website.
John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA Posted May 15, 2007 Posted May 15, 2007 Kudos to ak2ary for working on that letter. Whoever helped to get ahold of Allen's comments to Grassley - again, great work! http://www.asppa.org/pdf_files/0514_2007-27NoticeFIN.pdf
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now