Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Under PPA 2006 for the 2006 plan year. Plan has 2 participants.

My understanding for a single employer DB plan is that the 404 limit is u p to 150% of current liability.

My understanding for a DB plan and a stand alone 401k plan (no matches, etc.) is that the 150% current liability still applies.

My understanding for a combined profit sharing, DB plan situation, the combined plan DB limit is the minimum up to 100% current liability (if greater than 25% of pay) and that a profit sharing contributes 8% of pay, subjects 2% of pay to an excise tax for 2006.

Now here is where things get a little dicey for me.

If we have a combined profit sharing, DB plan situation, and between 1% and 6% is contributed to the profit sharing plan then is the plan DB limit:

the greater of minimum or 100% CL (assume greater than 25%) or

since profit sharing contribution does not exceed 6% is the combined DB plan limit ignored and the single employer limit of 150% of CL applicable?

Thanks.

Posted

This particular issue was clarified by IRS Notice 2007-28 Q&A 9 which provides that the 100% rather than the 150% CL limit applies.

Under PPA 2006 for the 2006 plan year. Plan has 2 participants.

My understanding for a single employer DB plan is that the 404 limit is u p to 150% of current liability.

My understanding for a DB plan and a stand alone 401k plan (no matches, etc.) is that the 150% current liability still applies.

My understanding for a combined profit sharing, DB plan situation, the combined plan DB limit is the minimum up to 100% current liability (if greater than 25% of pay) and that a profit sharing contributes 8% of pay, subjects 2% of pay to an excise tax for 2006.

Now here is where things get a little dicey for me.

If we have a combined profit sharing, DB plan situation, and between 1% and 6% is contributed to the profit sharing plan then is the plan DB limit:

the greater of minimum or 100% CL (assume greater than 25%) or

since profit sharing contribution does not exceed 6% is the combined DB plan limit ignored and the single employer limit of 150% of CL applicable?

Thanks.

The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.

Posted

Yes, I am aware of Q-9.

In one sentence it says "When employer contributions do not exceed 6% ..., the combined limit of 404a7 does not apply to employer DC contributions"

So in playing devil's advocate if 404a7 does not apply perhaps we revert to single employer limit.

Maybe....

I certainly see your point that the limit is probably 100% CL.

To take a step back are we in agreement that if only 401k deferrals are made to a DC plan then the DB limit is the 150% limit?

So the thought was that perhaps paying less than 6% to DC swas analagous to 401k deferral only plan.

Thanks.

Posted

BTW, in case you were not aware, the Academy sent this letter to IRS w/r/t Notice 2007-28:

http://www.actuary.org/pdf/pension/irs_0328.pdf

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Guest Guest_named_Howie Simon_*
Posted
BTW, in case you were not aware, the Academy sent this letter to IRS w/r/t Notice 2007-28:

http://www.actuary.org/pdf/pension/irs_0328.pdf

ASPPA sent a letter to IRS yesterday and is posted to the website.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use