Chaz Posted August 10, 2007 Share Posted August 10, 2007 Treas. Reg. Section 1.105-11©(2) contains the eligibility nondiscrimination test for self-insured reimbursement plans. Section ©(2)(iii)(D) contains an exclusion from testing for employees included as part of a bargaining unit. I don't see the same exclusion in Section ©(3), which contains the Benefits test. Can an employer exclude collectively bargained employees when it runs the Benefits test for its MERP? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaz Posted August 14, 2007 Author Share Posted August 14, 2007 Bueller? Bueller? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J Simmons Posted August 14, 2007 Share Posted August 14, 2007 Good impersonation of Ben Stein! I believe the exclusion set forth in Treas. Reg. Section 1.105-11©(2)(iii)(D) applies to the nondiscriminatory benefit requirement of ©(3) just as it does to the eligibility to participate requirement of ©(2), where specified. The reason: ©(3) references participants, and that the same benefits for participants who are highly compensated individuals must be provided to other participants. Not to other employees generally. Participants are only employees that are eligible. Since ©(2) allows you to exclude from the eligibility rule those employees that are under a union contract, they would not be part of your participant pool for applying the ©(3) rule. John Simmons johnsimmonslaw@gmail.com Note to Readers: For you, I'm a stranger posting on a bulletin board. Posts here should not be given the same weight as personalized advice from a professional who knows or can learn all the facts of your situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now