Effen Posted September 20, 2007 Posted September 20, 2007 I have a new client who was required to provide the 2006 PBGC Participant Notice, but whose previous service provider (insert large national firm here) neglected to tell them about the requirement. I spoke to the previous provider and they agreed that one should have been done. So, I have prepared the notice for the client and told them to issue it ASAP. My question relates to the 2007 PBGC filing. As you know there is a question asking about the previous year's participant notice requirement. There are only 3 possible answers to the question. 1) Was not required to be issued, 2) Was issued on time and in accordance with all other applicable requirements, or 3) An explanation is provided here. I plan on selecting Option 3 and providing an explanation, but I am wondering how the PBGC will react. I know there is a potential $1,100 per day fine, but I can't believe they would actually asses it. Has anyone ever selected Option 3? If so, how did the PBGC react? The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now