Guest skresq Posted October 4, 2007 Posted October 4, 2007 I know there was a similar post below, but in this case, the cycle A deadline was missed (for no good-faith or excusable reason). Is a VCP submission required? Is the plan's qualified status in jeopardy? Can/should we file off cycle as soon as possible? I can't find any information with respec to the consequences of missing the deadline.
Belgarath Posted October 5, 2007 Posted October 5, 2007 I'm not clear from your post who didn't file what on time. Is this a case where a practitioner/sponsor did not file by the end of the cycle A deadline? If so, take a look at Revenue Procedure 2007-49, which I think should assist you.
Guest Williams Posted October 5, 2007 Posted October 5, 2007 I have a similar issue, so I reviewed Rev. Proc. 2007-49. It only addresses failure of practioner or sponsor to file M&P or VS plan. Is there anything out there addressing what happens if individually-designed plan was not submitted during applicable Cycle?
Belgarath Posted October 5, 2007 Posted October 5, 2007 Without taking the time to do a detailed reading, isn't this an allowable VCP correction under RP 2006-27, for a nonamender? There's an appendix for a sample submission guideline as well, Appendix E or F, I believe. But I'm going just from memory on this, so you don't want to take my word for it.
Guest skresq Posted October 5, 2007 Posted October 5, 2007 To clarify my original post, the plan is an individually designed plan, and I agree that 2007-49 does not apply. 2007-44 states that an application for a determination letter beyond your cycle is treated as off-cycle, but I don't think a simple off-cycle filing is enough since we're dealing with EGTRRA as well. Appendix F of 2006-27 addresses vcp for interim non-amenders with respect to good faith interim EGTRRA amendments, which is not the problem here. Appendix E of 2006-27 addresses vcp for non-amenders and allows identification of "EGTRRA" as the failure. I would obviously like to avoid the cost and time of a vcp submission if it isn't necessary, but I'm starting to think Appendix E is the way to go. Any thoughts?
Guest Richard Tennenbaum Posted December 6, 2007 Posted December 6, 2007 I think it is a simple off cycle submission as described in 2007-44. It's not an interim EGTRRA non-amender issue, at least I don't believe that it is.
HarleyBabe Posted December 7, 2007 Posted December 7, 2007 I had the similar post but no one responded. There was relief if you missed the cycle A filing through January 8, 2008 in you were in good faith reliance. My question was, what exactly needs filed on the 8th. There was some hint that you could file a working document if you had all cumulative amendments signed but I think that was only if you met the original deadline. Does anyone know about this extension that was given? It is on the IRS website. If so, what exactly do I need to file?
Randy Watson Posted December 18, 2007 Posted December 18, 2007 I think it is a simple off cycle submission as described in 2007-44. It's not an interim EGTRRA non-amender issue, at least I don't believe that it is. Does anyone agree/disagree with this? It seems like an off cycle submission to me and I believe that means you just go to the "back of the line". Correct?
Blinky the 3-eyed Fish Posted January 14, 2008 Posted January 14, 2008 VCP submission with a half-fee if filed by 1/31/08. 5300 filed with VCP sub. "What's in the big salad?" "Big lettuce, big carrots, tomatoes like volleyballs."
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now