Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Generally, we find the answer book series to be an excellent first resource on many plan issues. The interpretations seem to be sound and they always provide sites for reference.

I recently read something in the Plan Termination Answer Book that surpised me.

It read as follows:

"Regardless of the magnitude of the operational defect, any defect that occurred outside the statute of limitations can be ignored"

It seems to me that a plan could be currently disqualified as the result of a prior operational defect even if it occurred outside the statute of limitations as that defect may lead to a current benefit that is incorrect.

Does anyone have an opinion on this?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use