Guest rfemmons Posted October 25, 2007 Posted October 25, 2007 If an existing 457(f) plan has a rabbi trust and thus the substantial risk of forfeiture was being subject to creditors, how should it be amended to comply with 409A?
QDROphile Posted October 25, 2007 Posted October 25, 2007 You have got to be kidding if you are suggesting that the credit risk was a substantial risk of forfeiture for section 457(f) purposes. If you are not kidding, you have nothing to worry about for section 409A compliance because all of the accrued amounts are already taxable.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now