Penman2006 Posted February 3, 2008 Posted February 3, 2008 Unit credit method and end of year val date. Plan participant terminates during the year but worked more than 1000 hours and therefore accrued a benefit. Should this person have a normal cost? My initial reaction is "yes" but my valuation software company disagrees and says that for a participant that terminated during the plan year that the whole AB (as of the year end) goes into the AL, rather than the beginning of year AB for the AL and the benefit accrual going into NC. Their method creates an actuarial loss all else being equal. I can't find anything in a text book that would support their position, and I can't think of anything in the Code either. What I can come up with from the Code is that a method that inherently creates gains or losses is not "reasonable". It seems that would apply here. Opinions?
Andy the Actuary Posted February 4, 2008 Posted February 4, 2008 What you contend makes sense, since the unit credit normal cost is the actuarial present value of benefit accrued during the year. More important, it is presumed that you, and not your software company, will sign the Schedule B. Have them provide you with their explanation and follow your best judgment before signing Schedule B. The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
Penman2006 Posted February 4, 2008 Author Posted February 4, 2008 I agree, the responsibility is on my shoulders.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now