Young Curmudgeon Posted February 22, 2008 Posted February 22, 2008 I have a plan that wants to add a provision that would add years of credit for benefit accrual, vesting and participation in the event of involuntary termination under certain circumstances. The benefit could result in a person with two years participation, receiving a seven years participation benefit and instantly becoming vested. The entire arrangement seems problematic. I see issues with benefits rights and features discrmination and I think it may be impossible to get this to pass the 411(b)-1 accrued benefit requirements. Even if we could pass a general test, is there a way around the 411(b)-1 issue?
david rigby Posted February 22, 2008 Posted February 22, 2008 I agree that this will (probably) cause backloading problems. I have seen this provision once before, but it was applied only to the vesting percent (eg, 100% vested if "laid off" with 3+ YOS), but don't know if it was ever a BRF concern. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Young Curmudgeon Posted February 22, 2008 Author Posted February 22, 2008 I failed to mention that this enhancement would only apply to one department in the company.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now