Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

If you make automatic form J&100%, you're fine; else, if J%50% is automatic form, need to offer J&75%.

The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.

Posted

The QJSA is important, not the normal form. What is the QJSA, 50% or 100%? If it's 100% and the 50% form is actuarially equivalent to the SLA, you are fine. If it's 50% you need a 75% option.

"What's in the big salad?"

"Big lettuce, big carrots, tomatoes like volleyballs."

Posted
If you make automatic form J&100%, you're fine; else, if J%50% is automatic form, need to offer J&75%.

So the distinction is which is the normal form? Mine is J&S 50%, the optional form is the J&S 100%, hence I need the QOSA?

Posted

Yup, a J&75% opion is needed unless the plan is amended to make the J&100% the automatic form and the J&50% an optional form.

The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.

Posted

What is the whys and wherefores for this 75% business? How did it come about? What does it fix? And when do we have to amend our plan?

Posted

The weirdness is that the law requires exactly 75%, rather than at least 75%, if the QJSA is a J&50. Took a while to get my thinking around that.

Posted
What is the whys and wherefores for this 75% business? How did it come about? What does it fix? And when do we have to amend our plan?

I believe you amend by the last day of the first plan year after 01/01/09, operate in compliance for distributions with annuity starting dates in plan years beginning after 12/31/07. There's a decent Q&A in Notice 2008-30.

  • 6 months later...
Guest TaftHart
Posted

Does this also apply to a plan that provides a 50& QJSA option but that subsidizes the surviving spouse at an 80% level? Why would a plan need to add 50% option when it wouldn't benefit the participant in any way?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use