Guest scheim Posted April 21, 2008 Report Share Posted April 21, 2008 Hypothetical: Self-insured dental plan does not condition receipt of a benefit upon obtaining approval in advance of any procedures. The plan's claims procedure only provides for resolution of post-service claims. I am in extreme pain and need a root canal and call my plan to see if it is covered. The plan tells me "No pre-certification is required. We can't tell you if it will be covered until afterwards." (I know that most times the plan will tell me but remember this is a hypothetical.) Does the plan violate ERISA Section 503 because it has not established proper claims procedures? The few things I have read have conclusorily stated that an urgent care claim is only such when the plan requires pre-certification (i.e. it is also a pre-service claim) and that seems to be a reasonable conclusion. But to me ERISA 503 is unclear. To make a long story short, it applies to pre-service claims and to post-service claims (2560.503-1(e)). Post service claims are any claim that is not a pre-service claim (2560-503(m)(3)). So what is a claim involving urgent care? What am I missing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sieve Posted September 3, 2008 Report Share Posted September 3, 2008 I think I undertstand your question, but you will be able to tell from my answer whether or not I really did understand it. I don't see how a plan that does not require pre-certification of a medical service (i.e., does not condition coverage for the service on pre-certification) fails to provide "reasonable procedures governing the filing of benefit claims, notification of benefit determinations, and approval of adverse benefit determinations" (DOL Reg. Section 2560.503-1(b)) just because the plan fails to voluntarily provide a guarantee in advance that a specific medical service is covered under the plan. There simply is nothing in the statute or the regs that requires certain benefit coverage to be pre-approved, or that requires a claims procedure to provide pre-approval for any specific medical services--it is left entirely to the health care plan to determine when pre-service claims will be required, and then to describe those situations and procedures in the SPD. If filing a pre-service claim is not a condition for receving the medical benefit, then the plan is not required to provide pre-service claims service/approval. The plan must describe all its claims procedures, including any prior approval requirements which are a condition of obtaining a benefit (DOL Reg. Section 2560.503-1(b)(2)), but is not required to provide any specific pre-approval service if it does not so chose. A pre-service claim is one where receipt of a benefit under the plan specifically depends on approval of the benefit before the medical care is provided. An urgent care claim is one where pre-authorization must be determined more quickly than normal because of the patient's medical condition. Although the regs do not differentiate between a pre-service and post-service urgent care claim, it makes no logical sense that an urgent care post-service claim should necessarily be resolved on a quicker timetable than a non-urgent care post-service claim. So, if your tooth hurts badly, but receving a root-canal does not require pre-approval under the plan, then you may certainly have an urgent-care situation, but you do not yet have a "claim involving urgent care" at that time if the plan does not entertain pre-service root canal coverage determinations as a pre-condition to covering that service under the plan. I hope that at least comes close to answering your question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now