Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I believe we've discussed that a new plan effective say 1/1/08 can be treated for funding purposes as if 1/10th of the 415 limit was available (allowed) on the first day of the plan year (1/1/08).

Is this a special rule just for the first plan year only ? or for the second year (2009) for funding purposes could you treat it as if you had 2/10ths of the dollar limit on 1/1/2009 ?

Posted

The 415 dollar limit phases in over the first 10 years of participation but is never less than 1/10th of the full dollar limit. But it is no help in year 2

Posted

Correct.

See IRC 415(b)(5), and don't forget to read subparagraph ©:

http://www.fourmilab.ch/ustax/www/t26-A-1-D-I-B-415.html

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Posted

Won't this work if the plan credits a year of participation for performance of one-hour of service and the participant gets up early?

The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.

Posted

Since the special 415 rule is no help in 2nd year (2009) then I guess the strategy of using past service credit for a new 2008 plan in order to create/fund full target liability cushion of 50% is a help in 1st year of plan (2008), but second year of plan since your past service liability at 1/1/09 is still just 1/10th of 415 YOP you have created a shortfall gain in year 2 for minimum funding (since you already funded 150% of target liability in 1st year) which partially offsets your normal cost for minimum funding in 2009, so your maximum 2009 is probably just roughly equal to normal cost since 150% of target liability (1/10th of dollar limit) has not changed since prior year and was already funded in 1st year

Ignoring at-risk assumptions impact on max contribution for the moment, does this sound right ? Corrections ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use