Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest mingblue
Posted

Are 401(k) catch-up contributions considered along with deferrals, match, & profit sharing allocations when aggregating with a DB for the General Test ?

Posted

no - they are complete "free-bees"

The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.

Guest Sieve
Posted

Catch-up contributions allocated in the current year are not taken into account, but catch-up contributions made for prior years are taken into account if prior years' allocations are considered when performing the general test. (Treas. Reg. Section 1.414(v)-1(d)(3)(ii).) Also, catch-up contributions are taken into account in determining if a plan is top heavy. So, they're not entirely free.

Guest mingblue
Posted

thanks for the info Effen and Sieve - another couple of questions - in the very first paragragh of the 1.414(v)-1 reg. it states that catch-ups are elective deferrals that exceed the applicable limits ( as long as they don't exceed their own limit, currently $5000) and in Example 6(ii) of the reg. it states "once participant E's elective deferrals for the calendar year 2006 exceed $15,000, subsequent elective deferrals are treated as catch-up contributions ................"

Taken alone these excerpts suggest to me that an elective deferral is classified as a catch-up once the 402(g)(1)(B) is reached - however, we have differing opinions within our department here - some say that the 402(g)(1)(B) need not be reached in order to count a deferral as a catch-up - for example, you could have only a $4000 deferral and another $5000 catch-up on top of that.

There is also an internal debate as to whether or not you need any deferrals to have a catch-up - e.g. could you have $0 deferrals and $5000 catch-up ?

Would appreciate your insights again .

Guest Sieve
Posted

Must exceed some limit to be a catch-up--either 402(g) or ADP (i.e., failed ADP test) or plan-imposed limit. No reason that a plan couldn't impose a 0% limit (for all, or only for HCEs), so that entire contribution for those people would be a catch-up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use