Guest merlin Posted July 30, 2008 Posted July 30, 2008 Plan Year = Limitation Year = Calendar Year. Benefit formula = 100% x hi-3 amc Deferred retiree, age 69 at 12/31/07 Hi-3 amc = 38113 AB at 12/31/07 = 20334 = actuarially increased 415 $ limit = Grandfathered Accrued Benefit At 12/31/08 the 415 hi-3 = 18750 Is he entitled to an actuarial increase on the GFAB, or is he capped at 20334? Possible answers: 1. Of course he is. The AI is part of the AB and protected by 411. 2. Of course not. The 415 limit, in this case now 18750, trumps all. Thank you for any and all thoughts.
tymesup Posted July 30, 2008 Posted July 30, 2008 If his high avg comp was 38,113, why would it decrease to 18,750?
Guest merlin Posted July 30, 2008 Posted July 30, 2008 The final 415 regs restrict the 100% of pay limit to using the 401(a)(17) comp. On that basis the high 3 at 12/31/08 would be (230000+225000+220000)/36=18750, no?
tymesup Posted July 30, 2008 Posted July 30, 2008 Sorry about that, I have to trip on annual/monthly once in awhile.
AndyH Posted July 30, 2008 Posted July 30, 2008 Ah, an answer shopper - I read the reg as grandfathering the accrued benefit as of the pye preceding 4/07, not extending the use of the grandfathered amount beyond that. But that may be a conservateive read and I don't lunch with the reg writers! But, the language seemed to indicate that a post-employment COLA was possible even if the result exceeded the hi 3. Merlin, this is merely a reaction based upon a couple of quick reads. I'd consider it a conservative interpretation. It will be interesting to read the comments of others.
tymesup Posted July 31, 2008 Posted July 31, 2008 For what it's worth - Tripodi 2008, p 5.80: Actuarial adjustments to the grandfathered benefit. Although the regulations do not address this issue explicitly, Treasury personnel have acknowledged that the grandfathered benefit, to the extent it is less than the actual average compensation of the participant (without regard to the IRC 401(a)(17) lmit), also may be actuarially increased for late retirement. For example, if the participant's actual average compensation is $400,000, additional actuarial increases in the grandfathered benefit could be made, provided that the annual benefit payable to the participant in any later year does not exceed the lesser of $400,000, or the applicable dollar limit under IRC 415 (b)(1)(A) that is in effect for such later year.
Guest merlin Posted August 1, 2008 Posted August 1, 2008 Thanks, tymesup. I guess it's "tyme" for the boss to pony up and get the 08 edition.
tymesup Posted August 1, 2008 Posted August 1, 2008 I'm trying to get us subscribed to TAG. In the meantime, I'm finding that Tripodi has some good stuff.
ak2ary Posted August 5, 2008 Posted August 5, 2008 This was a huge issue late last year and at the beginning of this year, The IRS national office has stated publicly in several meetings that it agrees that the grandfathered benefit is not only the accrued benefit as of the grandfather date but also all future actuarial increases (assuming the increases do not raise the benefit above the grandfathered hi 3 year pay)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now