Andy the Actuary Posted August 14, 2008 Posted August 14, 2008 Calendar year plan has following characteristics for 2008. 2007 contribution without regard to FSA CB was $0 so no quarterly contribution due. FT = 2,000,000 TNC=100,000 Assets=2,400,000 FS COB=900,000 Client wishes to avoid making any contribution for 2008 and in the great hereafter. If client elects to burn 600,000, then for 2008, we have FT - (Assets - FSCOB) + TNC = 0. Further, there will be no quarterly contribution requirement in 2009 and most likely, no contribution after burning or using credit balances in 2009. Alternatively, client could choose not to burn credit balance. This will effectively set up 7 year amortization of CB which client can then offset using the FSCOB. There would, however, be a quarterly contribution requirement for 2009 and it might be $0 or FSCOB could be used to offset. Appart from the apparent administrative advantages of the first approach, is any advantage to the client perceived selecting one approach over the other? The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
Calavera Posted August 15, 2008 Posted August 15, 2008 Under the first approach you have $300,000 of FSCOB left for 2009 (ignoring interest). Under the second approach you will be exempt from setting up amortization base ((Assets-Prefunding CB only) / FT >92%). Therefore you will only use $100,000 of FSCOB to cover the 2008 minimum, and another $100,000 of FSCOB to cover the 2009 minimum/quarterlies. I vote for the second approach.
Andy the Actuary Posted August 15, 2008 Author Posted August 15, 2008 Under the first approach you have $300,000 of FSCOB left for 2009 (ignoring interest).Under the second approach you will be exempt from setting up amortization base ((Assets-Prefunding CB only) / FT >92%). Therefore you will only use $100,000 of FSCOB to cover the 2008 minimum, and another $100,000 of FSCOB to cover the 2009 minimum/quarterlies. I vote for the second approach. Thank you, I stand corrected. No base will be established. The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now