12AX7 Posted September 23, 2008 Posted September 23, 2008 We have a number of plans that cover only owners and are less than 5 years old. The plans have year-end valuation dates. Our Consulting Actuary has suggested holding off on the 2008 AFTAP cerfitications for now, rather than change the valuation date to beginning of year. 2007 AFTAP certifications were done timely. So, the only restriction for these plans would seem to be the inability to pay lump sums. Since the plans only cover owners, this would not appear to be an immediate concern. Is there anything other issue I would need to address? Thanks.
SoCalActuary Posted September 23, 2008 Posted September 23, 2008 You cannot be certain at this time that a "restart" amendment will affect your maximum deductions for the following two plan years.
12AX7 Posted September 23, 2008 Author Posted September 23, 2008 What would be "restarted" in the amendment? I don't see the accrued benefit affected within the first 5 years. I appreciate clarification.
mwyatt Posted September 23, 2008 Posted September 23, 2008 Looking at 436(g) New Plans, subsections b, c, and e (but not d) shall not apply to a plan for the first 5 plan years of the plan. b - shutdown benefits (probably not very applicable in any event to a small plan c - plan amendments increasing liability e - limitation on benefit accruals for plans with severe funding shortfalls. So none of these apply in the generic case. d - limitations on lump sums, but as stated probably not a concern with a one-man plan just starting up. Since 436(e) doesn't apply, don't see where a restart amendment is required or would have any effect on 404(o) funding.
12AX7 Posted September 23, 2008 Author Posted September 23, 2008 Thanks for the second opinion. Since we're a week away from the 9/30 deadline, I wanted to feel secure on this issue.
Guest Sieve Posted September 23, 2008 Posted September 23, 2008 Sorry. Wrong post. I thought a post titled "Sound advice" could help me evaluate a new set of Bose speakers. (sorry . . . )
Andy the Actuary Posted September 23, 2008 Posted September 23, 2008 Sorry. Wrong post. I thought a post titled "Sound advice" could help me evaluate a new set of Bose speakers. (sorry . . . ) Sieve, FYI, that would be US Senators Larry Craig and Mike Crapo from Bose, Idaho The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
SoCalActuary Posted September 23, 2008 Posted September 23, 2008 Looking at 436(g) New Plans, subsections b, c, and e (but not d) shall not apply to a plan for the first 5 plan years of the plan.b - shutdown benefits (probably not very applicable in any event to a small plan c - plan amendments increasing liability e - limitation on benefit accruals for plans with severe funding shortfalls. So none of these apply in the generic case. d - limitations on lump sums, but as stated probably not a concern with a one-man plan just starting up. Since 436(e) doesn't apply, don't see where a restart amendment is required or would have any effect on 404(o) funding. Thanks for pointing out my error. I guess that this is not a good place to jump to conclusions.
Mike Preston Posted September 24, 2008 Posted September 24, 2008 Actually, I think it is great place to jump to conclusions. Better than a client meeting! I'd rather be gently informed here than have to back track there!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now