Guest lip Posted October 23, 2008 Posted October 23, 2008 If Dr.J rolls 100k into a db plan;can he have investment autonomy over the rollover;while the pooled DB money is managed separately? If the segregated monies grow tenfold does it effect the valuation in any way?
Blinky the 3-eyed Fish Posted October 23, 2008 Posted October 23, 2008 The rollover monies can be participant directed. The plan document should spell this out. They will not affect the valuation whatsoever. "What's in the big salad?" "Big lettuce, big carrots, tomatoes like volleyballs."
tymesup Posted October 24, 2008 Posted October 24, 2008 Assuming this isn't old DB money, it won't affect the valuation.
Guest lip Posted October 31, 2008 Posted October 31, 2008 Assuming this isn't old DB money, it won't affect the valuation. what if it is old db monies
tymesup Posted October 31, 2008 Posted October 31, 2008 If it's old DB money, you've got Code Section 415 issues, as the old and the new combined can't exceed the limitations. Since the old money was paid in the past and the new money hasn't been paid yet, you've got multiple annuity starting dates. There are several schools of thought on how to do the calculations, but all agree it's a mess.
Blinky the 3-eyed Fish Posted October 31, 2008 Posted October 31, 2008 To be clear, the rollover dollars, whether old DB money or not, will not affect the valuation. If there was a previous distribution from a DB plan sponsored by the same employer or related employer, that may affect the DB valuation. "What's in the big salad?" "Big lettuce, big carrots, tomatoes like volleyballs."
david rigby Posted October 31, 2008 Posted October 31, 2008 If it's old DB money, you've got Code Section 415 issues, as the old and the new combined can't exceed the limitations. ... assuming the old plan and the new plan (or rather, the sponsors) have something to do with each other. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Guest lip Posted October 31, 2008 Posted October 31, 2008 If it's old DB money, you've got Code Section 415 issues, as the old and the new combined can't exceed the limitations. ... assuming the old plan and the new plan (or rather, the sponsors) have something to do with each other. the old plan was 2 db plans for same company. they are both being terminated and a cash balance is being installed. Client may want "added protection" of Erisa plan from creditors than roll it into IRA. does asset growth of the segregated old db monies affect val in any way?
Blinky the 3-eyed Fish Posted October 31, 2008 Posted October 31, 2008 To be clear, the rollover dollars, whether old DB money or not, will not affect the valuation. This answers your question. "What's in the big salad?" "Big lettuce, big carrots, tomatoes like volleyballs."
Guest lip Posted November 12, 2008 Posted November 12, 2008 To be clear, the rollover dollars, whether old DB money or not, will not affect the valuation. This answers your question. Still unclear;didnt you say if it was from a terminated plan that was same plan sponsor it could change val?
Blinky the 3-eyed Fish Posted November 12, 2008 Posted November 12, 2008 No, you are confusing two points. A distribution from a DB plan sponsored by a related employer affects the 415 limits. If someone has a lesser benefit in the second plan because their 415 limit is reduced due to the distribution from the first plan, that affects the valuation. It's that amount of the distribution that has the effect. The changes in value once it moves to an IRA, a DC plan, or another DB plan of the employer are totally irrelevant. That is why I made this statement: To be clear, the rollover dollars, whether old DB money or not, will not affect the valuation. If there was a previous distribution from a DB plan sponsored by the same employer or related employer, that may affect the DB valuation. So once again, it's the distribution amount that matters, not the rollover amount. The rollover amount can change all it wants and it makes no difference. It's the distribution amount that is considered. Does that help at all? "What's in the big salad?" "Big lettuce, big carrots, tomatoes like volleyballs."
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now