Guest DCquestioner Posted October 30, 2008 Posted October 30, 2008 Prospect is an S-corp that has never taken W-2 in the past. She intends to take W-2 for the first time in 2008. If a new plan is set up for her, and I run it as an end of year valuation to account for the salary she takes in 2008, will I have a funding target that can be used to maximize her deduction? She has the past service to give her a benefit, but as of the beginning of the year, her average salary was $0? Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
J Simmons Posted October 30, 2008 Posted October 30, 2008 If the S Corp is audited, how will she justify no W-2 prior to this year, and now all of a sudden W-2 wages? Did she not perform personal services for the S Corp prior to this year? John Simmons johnsimmonslaw@gmail.com Note to Readers: For you, I'm a stranger posting on a bulletin board. Posts here should not be given the same weight as personalized advice from a professional who knows or can learn all the facts of your situation.
Lou S. Posted October 30, 2008 Posted October 30, 2008 Form a plan standpoint I don't think you will have a problem. You will still be limited to the 10% participation phase in on the dollar limit. If you are trying to justify the 100% comp limit (because it may be lower than the phased in dollar limit) you might get challeged by the IRS if you are claiming past service for years with no W-2 wages but pass through dividend S-corp income.
Guest DCquestioner Posted October 30, 2008 Posted October 30, 2008 This question seems to be running parallel to another current post on the board, but I suppose that another way to ask the question is to ask if the funding target is calculated on the val date or at the beginning of the year for purposes of calculating the maximum deduction? So if I'm doing an EOY valuation, it doesn't look like there's a problem. Does that make sense?
Guest RBlaine Posted November 3, 2008 Posted November 3, 2008 This question seems to be running parallel to another current post on the board, but I suppose that another way to ask the question is to ask if the funding target is calculated on the val date or at the beginning of the year for purposes of calculating the maximum deduction?So if I'm doing an EOY valuation, it doesn't look like there's a problem. Does that make sense? Isn't the FT the end of year present value of the BoY accrued Benefit? If the BoY AB is $0, then your FT is $0. Or, I've misunderstood you.
ak2ary Posted November 3, 2008 Posted November 3, 2008 She can of course accrue the 10000 deminimis benefit as of the first day of the first plan year since it is less than 1/10 of the dollar limit and is not subject to the 100% of pay limit Then as she takes actual real w2 pay she will get her own 100% of pay limit of greater than 10,000 by the end of the first year and will never have to deal with that limit again. Of course, to generate funding target you must have the 10000 acrue as of the effective date (first day of the year) or its not in the funding target, regardless of the val date. Make sure you pass the 411(b) accrual rules.
tymesup Posted November 4, 2008 Posted November 4, 2008 The 10,000 minimum benefit is pro-rated for service less than 10 years, so it's not going to help a whole lot.
ak2ary Posted November 4, 2008 Posted November 4, 2008 I assumed from She has the past service to give her a benefit, but as of the beginning of the year, her average salary was $0? that she had the service
GBurns Posted November 4, 2008 Posted November 4, 2008 How does she get past service if there was no W-2 ? George D. Burns Cost Reduction Strategies Burns and Associates, Inc www.costreductionstrategies.com(under construction) www.employeebenefitsstrategies.com(under construction)
ak2ary Posted November 4, 2008 Posted November 4, 2008 From the description above...it is clear she has issues from earlier years with underpayment of FICA But that is well beyond the scope of this post
J Simmons Posted November 4, 2008 Posted November 4, 2008 But since those S Corp earnings from earlier years were treated as dividends and not W-2 compensation, how do you at this time for plan purposes get to recharacterize part or all of such 'dividends' as 'compensation' just because its convenient for plan design purposes to do so? John Simmons johnsimmonslaw@gmail.com Note to Readers: For you, I'm a stranger posting on a bulletin board. Posts here should not be given the same weight as personalized advice from a professional who knows or can learn all the facts of your situation.
Blinky the 3-eyed Fish Posted November 4, 2008 Posted November 4, 2008 Compensation is not a requirement for a year of service. "What's in the big salad?" "Big lettuce, big carrots, tomatoes like volleyballs."
J Simmons Posted November 4, 2008 Posted November 4, 2008 Compensation is not a requirement for a year of service. Thanks, 3-eyes John Simmons johnsimmonslaw@gmail.com Note to Readers: For you, I'm a stranger posting on a bulletin board. Posts here should not be given the same weight as personalized advice from a professional who knows or can learn all the facts of your situation.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now