tuni88 Posted November 9, 2008 Posted November 9, 2008 A few years ago we lowered the vesting requirement in our DB plan from 5 years of service to 3. I don't remember why but I vaguely recollect we HAD TO to stay in compliance with law. Now I run across a small company's fairly new SPD wherein they state they still have 5-year vesting. Is 5-year vesting still allowed (0% vested before 5 years, then jumps to 100% at 5)?
J Simmons Posted November 9, 2008 Posted November 9, 2008 How new is 'fairly new' for that SPD? For plan years beginning after 2006, cliff vesting cannot require more than three vesting years. IRC § 411(a)(2)(B) as amended by PL 109-280 (Pension Protection Act of 2006), Act § 904(a); ERISA § 203(a), as amended by PL 109-280 (Pension Protection Act of 2006), Act § 904(b) John Simmons johnsimmonslaw@gmail.com Note to Readers: For you, I'm a stranger posting on a bulletin board. Posts here should not be given the same weight as personalized advice from a professional who knows or can learn all the facts of your situation.
david rigby Posted November 9, 2008 Posted November 9, 2008 Oops. IRC 411(a)(2)B) applies to DC plans. Perhaps the 3-yr vesting was adopted in a DB plan because: - the DC plan was being amended and someone decided to amend the DB plan for "agreement"; or - someone did not understand the law; - the DB plan is a cash balance plan (special PPA-created vesting rule for these types of DB plans). I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
J Simmons Posted November 9, 2008 Posted November 9, 2008 Thanks, David! John Simmons johnsimmonslaw@gmail.com Note to Readers: For you, I'm a stranger posting on a bulletin board. Posts here should not be given the same weight as personalized advice from a professional who knows or can learn all the facts of your situation.
JAY21 Posted November 10, 2008 Posted November 10, 2008 Is it possible your plan went from a non-top heavy plan (less than 60% of total benefits to Key Employees) to a top-heavy plan (60% or more of total benefits are going to Key Employees). That could be another reason as Top-Heavy plans can only use a 3-year cliff vesting or a 2/20 vesting schedule, not a 5-year cliff vesting.
tymesup Posted November 12, 2008 Posted November 12, 2008 Perhaps the vesting was changed so the DB would have the same vesting as the DC. If you were cross-testing, you wouldn't have to adjust for the different schedules. If you were adjusting for vesting, you'd have to decide whether an old Revenue Ruling (74-166?) can still be applied for this purpose.
ScottR Posted November 16, 2008 Posted November 16, 2008 A few years ago we lowered the vesting requirement in our DB plan from 5 years of service to 3. I don't remember why but I vaguely recollect we HAD TO to stay in compliance with law.Now I run across a small company's fairly new SPD wherein they state they still have 5-year vesting. Is 5-year vesting still allowed (0% vested before 5 years, then jumps to 100% at 5)? PPA requires no more than 3-year cliff vesting for hybrid plans (including CB plans). I think traditional, non-TH DB plans may still use 5-year cliff.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now