Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

a company maintains two plans a db plan for the union and a dc plan for non union.

are either true?

1) the funding as % of compensation are independent of each other because one plan is collectively bargained.

or

2) the ps can still fund up to 25% of comp because the union plan is covered under pbgc.

Am I way off?

Posted

1) If no one "benefits" in both the DB and the DC, the combined plan deduction limits of 404(a)(7) don't apply.

2) If the plan is covered by the PBGC, the combined plan deduction limits of 404(a)(7) don't apply.

The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.

Posted

I think I agree with Effen, but remember that "benefitting" under 404(a)(7) is not the same as that term is used in most other contexts, such as 401(a)(4).

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use