abanky Posted November 12, 2008 Posted November 12, 2008 a company maintains two plans a db plan for the union and a dc plan for non union. are either true? 1) the funding as % of compensation are independent of each other because one plan is collectively bargained. or 2) the ps can still fund up to 25% of comp because the union plan is covered under pbgc. Am I way off?
Effen Posted November 12, 2008 Posted November 12, 2008 1) If no one "benefits" in both the DB and the DC, the combined plan deduction limits of 404(a)(7) don't apply. 2) If the plan is covered by the PBGC, the combined plan deduction limits of 404(a)(7) don't apply. The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
david rigby Posted November 12, 2008 Posted November 12, 2008 I think I agree with Effen, but remember that "benefitting" under 404(a)(7) is not the same as that term is used in most other contexts, such as 401(a)(4). I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now