Below Ground Posted April 29, 2009 Posted April 29, 2009 Plan has been operating for several years under plan terms that were supposedly modified by an amendment. Problem is that amendment should have changed allocation requirments to no conditions, but did not. Plan languange still says 1000 Hours and Last Day required to receive allocation. Operationally, the plan allocated to all participants, regardless of hours and employment status. While this was exclusively a benefit for the NHCE, it was still an operational failure. This went on for over 5 years! How should this be corrected? Thanks for any and all comments. Having braved the blizzard, I take a moment to contemplate the meaning of life. Should I really be riding in such cold? Why are my goggles covered with a thin layer of ice? Will this effect coverage testing? QPA, QKA
J Simmons Posted June 7, 2009 Posted June 7, 2009 You might consider Larry's approach John Simmons johnsimmonslaw@gmail.com Note to Readers: For you, I'm a stranger posting on a bulletin board. Posts here should not be given the same weight as personalized advice from a professional who knows or can learn all the facts of your situation.
Guest Sieve Posted June 7, 2009 Posted June 7, 2009 Even the approach I describe, aggressive or not, has its limits. I would say that 5 years without correcting a "scrivener's error", even if correction occurs as soon as the error is discovered, is too long a time period. I'd use EPCRS Section 4.05(1) to correct by amendment, since your OP indicates that such a retroactive amendment would benefit NHCEs and therefore it apparently would pass the non-discrimination standards of IRC Section 401(a)(4) and 410(b). If, operationally, the amendment is not non-discriminatory, then a mere amendment would not properly correct, and more would be required (such as an additional allocation for prior years to the NHCEs). Self-correction would not be available under EPCRS for this amendment (see Section 4.05(2)).
Below Ground Posted June 8, 2009 Author Posted June 8, 2009 okay. thanks. Having braved the blizzard, I take a moment to contemplate the meaning of life. Should I really be riding in such cold? Why are my goggles covered with a thin layer of ice? Will this effect coverage testing? QPA, QKA
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now