Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The rules are out that we need to amend the plans that have a normal retirement age of less than 62. I have quite a few plans with 55, 59, and 60. Seems a shame to have to do that when some are really retiring at that early age - one participant doctor or lawyer plans.

Does this apply to DC plans also? It really doesnt specify in the notice. Also - does this include the provisions for early retirement age 55? Does that need to be taken away also?

I have attached the article from ASPPA. Thanks

(Right at the top of the ASPPA ASAP it says it's copyrighted and for internal use only, so I deleted it from your post.)

Posted

It applies to all "pension" plans, so that includes money purchase plans (and target benefit plans, which are money purchase plans).

I don't believe it affects other DC plans; it's tied in with in-service distributions being allowed from pension plans after age 62 under PPA.

Ed Snyder

Posted

I think someone posted that the IRS verbally at least has said they don't have a problem with using NRA of 62 for distribution (in-service) purposes combined with an early retirement age of say 55 where the actuary assumes the participant(s) will retire at the ERA, anyone have any more thoughts on whether this might fly ?

Posted

That was the topic of a gray book Q&A, that, as Bird said, in-service was the target and they don't really care about ERD so that is how you handle contractual benefits, just call them ERD not NRD. Make NRD compliant and irrelevant.

Posted
That was the topic of a gray book Q&A, that, as Bird said, in-service was the target and they don't really care about ERD so that is how you handle contractual benefits, just call them ERD not NRD. Make NRD compliant and irrelevant.

Thanks everyone!!!

Posted

Befor amending, be sure to look at the effects of the amendment on any DB/DC combo plans - I would not just automatically add an unsubsidized early retirement based on the plan's prior NRA and I'd be careful to pick a new retirement age that still gets you the testing age needed to pass 401(a)(4). FWIW.

Posted
Does this requirement (no NRA <62) apply to a profit sharing plan that contains merged money purchase assets?

Yes it does. Thanks

Posted

This is the Gray Book item mentioned by AndyH:

Gray Book Q&A 2009-37

PPA: Other DB Plan Issues: Required Change to Normal Retirement Age

Where data is not available, or contractual requirements limit the option of retrenching on a plan’s current low normal retirement date, what options are available for meeting the regulatory requirements for such provisions?

RESPONSE

The regulation on normal retirement dates requires that a normal retirement age be an age, and requires justification for setting the age below age 62 as permitted by PPA. One issue of concern to the Service is allowing in-service payment. Plans may be amended to add an acceptable NRD while adding an early retirement provision based on the current NRD so that participants who actually retire are provided the same benefit as provided by the current plan.

The above Response is a summary, prepared by representatives of the Program Committee, of the oral responses to the question posed to certain staff members of the Treasury and IRS, which represent only personal views of the individuals who provided them. Accordingly, the Response does not necessarily represent the positions of the Treasury or the IRS and cannot be relied upon by any taxpayer for any purpose.

Copyright © 2009, Enrolled Actuaries Meeting

All rights reserved by Enrolled Actuaries Meeting. Permission is granted to print or otherwise reproduce a limited number of copies of the material on the CD-ROM for personal, internal, classroom, or other instructional use, on the condition that the foregoing copyright notice is used so as to give reasonable notice of the copyright of the Enrolled Actuaries Meeting. This consent for free limited copying without prior consent of the Enrolled Actuaries Meeting does not extend to making copies for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes, for inclusion in new collective works, or for sale or resale.

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use