Guest PLHart Posted June 19, 2009 Posted June 19, 2009 For a 100% shareholder employee of a Sub-S Corp. I have the following ?’s: 1. Is his comp for plan purposes limited to his W-2 or do we also include all or a portion of his K-1 income? 2. Is the deduction for any employer contribs attributable to his account taken on the corporate return with everyone elses (as it would be for a regular corp.) or is it taken on 1040 (as it would for a sole prop. Or a partner in a partnership? Any cites appreciated!
John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA Posted June 19, 2009 Posted June 19, 2009 The owner of the S Corp is treated like an employee for plan purposes (assuming they are not a passive investor). The S Corp dividend (the K-1 amount) is not compensation for plan purposes. Use W-2. The deduction goes on the 1120 just like the employees.
Below Ground Posted June 19, 2009 Posted June 19, 2009 The definition of Compensation under most plan documents will say no "S-Corp Dividends" as that is the law. Having braved the blizzard, I take a moment to contemplate the meaning of life. Should I really be riding in such cold? Why are my goggles covered with a thin layer of ice? Will this effect coverage testing? QPA, QKA
K2retire Posted June 19, 2009 Posted June 19, 2009 And this is likely to really annoy the owner who was probably advised to take little or no W-2 comp to avoid Social Security and Medicare taxes. But you can't have your cake and eat it too.
Belgarath Posted June 22, 2009 Posted June 22, 2009 I agree with the previous posts. The only citations that I know of are PLR 8716060, and Durando vs. U.S. There's an older Revenue Ruling, 59-221, which clearly stated that pass-through income may not be used - and the Durando decision referred to this in the analysis.
Calavera Posted June 22, 2009 Posted June 22, 2009 Here is another mentioning of S-Corp. IRS Publication 560, page 5 - Net earnings include a partner’s distributive share of partnership income or loss (other than separately stated items, such as capital gains and losses). It does not include income passed through to shareholders of S corporations.
jevd Posted June 22, 2009 Posted June 22, 2009 I was admiring the beauty of Kaye when Edith came into view And I found to my dismay That you can't have your Kaye and Edith too. JEVD Making the complex understandable.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now