Richard Anderson Posted November 11, 2009 Posted November 11, 2009 Does anyone see a problem with the following definition of compensation, that will be in cash balnce plan. The definition will apply only to the sole proprietor owner. Any other employees would of course have the normal definition of comp. Definition of comp for owner only = Only compensation in excess of $100,000.
Effen Posted November 11, 2009 Posted November 11, 2009 Interesting idea. As long as it is non-discriminatory I don't see why it would be a problem. Couldn't you also use a traditional compensation definition, but create a benefit formula that only recognizes compensation in excess of 100K for the owner group. I'm assuming you are doing this as a way to only have an accrual if the sole prop. has a "good" year. I think doing it through the benefit formula would be a little cleaner. I don't like to mess with the definition of compensation. The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
Richard Anderson Posted November 11, 2009 Author Posted November 11, 2009 Thanks Effen, Sounds like a better way.
Guest Sieve Posted November 12, 2009 Posted November 12, 2009 Then wouldn't you only be able to consider $145,000 for benefit accrual purposes (i.e., the amount up to the $245,000 Section 401(a)(17) limitation that exceeds $100,000)?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now