Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Does anyone see a problem with the following definition of compensation, that will be in cash balnce plan.

The definition will apply only to the sole proprietor owner. Any other employees would of course have the normal definition of comp.

Definition of comp for owner only = Only compensation in excess of $100,000.

Posted

Interesting idea. As long as it is non-discriminatory I don't see why it would be a problem.

Couldn't you also use a traditional compensation definition, but create a benefit formula that only recognizes compensation in excess of 100K for the owner group. I'm assuming you are doing this as a way to only have an accrual if the sole prop. has a "good" year.

I think doing it through the benefit formula would be a little cleaner. I don't like to mess with the definition of compensation.

The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.

Posted

Then wouldn't you only be able to consider $145,000 for benefit accrual purposes (i.e., the amount up to the $245,000 Section 401(a)(17) limitation that exceeds $100,000)?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use