emmetttrudy Posted November 17, 2009 Posted November 17, 2009 Everything I have read and seen regarding Cash Balance contributions is that they are strictly age-dependent. I've come across a couple of different maximum calculators that tell me a person born in 1956 could put away about $135,000 per year and a person born in 1963 could put away approximately $80,000 per year. Is this true regardless of their compensation? For example, if you had a 2 person plan (both owners), at the ages above, could the credits be $135k and $80k, respectively, even if they are making only $50,000 each?
david rigby Posted November 17, 2009 Posted November 17, 2009 Usually, such examples of DB plan contribution anticipate that the participant has compensation sufficient to fund for a benefit under IRC 415(b)(1)(A). In your example, it appears that 415(b)(1)(B) would apply. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
emmetttrudy Posted November 17, 2009 Author Posted November 17, 2009 Are there any tools out there that could provide me a good estimate based on compensation that isn't at the max?
Blinky the 3-eyed Fish Posted November 17, 2009 Posted November 17, 2009 I know of a few actuaries who are tools. They could tell you the answer. This is an educated guess and I didn't check the numbers you provided, but chances are they are for age 62 retirement. The dollar limit is $195,000 for that age. Thus if compensation is only $50,000, and assuming that too is the hi-3 average, then take the numbers and multiply by 50/195. Of course, nothing substitutes for using an actual tool, err... actuary. "What's in the big salad?" "Big lettuce, big carrots, tomatoes like volleyballs."
emmetttrudy Posted November 17, 2009 Author Posted November 17, 2009 If the hi-3 avg is only $50,000 then we're looking at a maximum monthly benefit of $4,167 commencing at NRA. This would be approximately a $620,000 lump sum at retirement. So obviously a contribution credit in excess of $100,000 for 6 or 7 years is going to end up in a lump sum greater than the 415 limit (assuming compensation remains about $50,000). Is your funding limited each year to the 415 limit? Or can you fund in excess of the 415 limit for a year, just as long as when distribution time comes the participant does not receive a distribution in excess of the 415 limit?
SoCalActuary Posted November 17, 2009 Posted November 17, 2009 If the hi-3 avg is only $50,000 then we're looking at a maximum monthly benefit of $4,167 commencing at NRA. This would be approximately a $620,000 lump sum at retirement. So obviously a contribution credit in excess of $100,000 for 6 or 7 years is going to end up in a lump sum greater than the 415 limit (assuming compensation remains about $50,000). Is your funding limited each year to the 415 limit? Or can you fund in excess of the 415 limit for a year, just as long as when distribution time comes the participant does not receive a distribution in excess of the 415 limit? For your general sales knowledge, the actuary is not allowed to project a funding benefit that exceeds the 415 limit. However, for plans where the HCE has not been granted a benefit increase by amendment recently, you can deduct a contribution that brings the funding ratio up to 150% of funding target. So a 415 limit benefit of $620,000 would allow you to deduct for a target asset of $930,000. What you do with the excess assets upon plan termination - well that is another discussion that involves your actuary.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now