katieinny Posted November 17, 2009 Posted November 17, 2009 Two companies are part of a controlled group. They want to maintain separate retirement plans. I think they can, as long as they are willing to go through the hoops of doing annual benefits, rights and features testing. In the end, they might determine that it's not worth it to continue that way, but as long as the plans pass brf testing, they can go on that way indefinitely. Am I right -- or is it just wishful thinking on my part?
Jim Chad Posted November 17, 2009 Posted November 17, 2009 You are on the right track. They can have two separate plans. They each have to pass coverage testing counting all employees of both companies in the denominator. This process is very similar to BRF testing.
katieinny Posted November 17, 2009 Author Posted November 17, 2009 Jim: Thank you for the confirmation. Yes, passing coverage should have been my first concern, before moving on to brfs.
Kevin C Posted November 17, 2009 Posted November 17, 2009 Even if coverage testing doesn't initially pass with two plans, the permissive aggregation rules of 1.410(b)-7(d) may allow you to keep the plans separate, but test them together.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now