Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Two companies are part of a controlled group. They want to maintain separate retirement plans. I think they can, as long as they are willing to go through the hoops of doing annual benefits, rights and features testing. In the end, they might determine that it's not worth it to continue that way, but as long as the plans pass brf testing, they can go on that way indefinitely. Am I right -- or is it just wishful thinking on my part?

Posted

You are on the right track. They can have two separate plans. They each have to pass coverage testing counting all employees of both companies in the denominator. This process is very similar to BRF testing.

Posted

Even if coverage testing doesn't initially pass with two plans, the permissive aggregation rules of 1.410(b)-7(d) may allow you to keep the plans separate, but test them together.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use