Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A small business owner has a DB Plan that she set up back in 2005 with about 3 other NHCEs. Prior to the implementation of the DB Plan she had a SEP, which she stopped contributing to in 2005 and has not contributed to since 2004. The DB plan is now frozen but she would like to contribute to the SEP again as opposed to making a contribution to the DB Plan. Trying to figure out the testing implications for this. Wouldn't the SEP need to be tested for 401(a)(4) combined with the DB Plan?

Posted
A small business owner has a DB Plan that she set up back in 2005 with about 3 other NHCEs. Prior to the implementation of the DB Plan she had a SEP, which she stopped contributing to in 2005 and has not contributed to since 2004. The DB plan is now frozen but she would like to contribute to the SEP again as opposed to making a contribution to the DB Plan. Trying to figure out the testing implications for this. Wouldn't the SEP need to be tested for 401(a)(4) combined with the DB Plan?

What testing do you need?

The DB is frozen, so there is no increase in benefits to any HCE, meaning no top-heavy minimums nor a4 testing.

You will need to confirm that 401(a)(26) was met, but that should be no problem.

Of course, you missed the chance to sell a profit sharing plan with age-wgt, integration or general testing features.

The SEP requires essentially uniform allocations, including amounts to people who work less than 100 hours.

Posted

You're right I forgot since the DB is frozen there is no 401(a)(4) testing. I believe the owner is just looking for a tax break, in which case she would be better off just making a contribution to the DB plan (AFTAP around 90%) as opposed to the SEP, otherwise like you said she would be giving a uniform allocation to all employees in the SEP.

Posted

You got me there. But the same aggregation rules apply to (a)(4) no matter how you are satifying the testing, so no aggregation with the SEP is allowed when testing the DB plan. No way, no how, no sir.

As an aside, I believe the aggregation rules are in the 410(b) regs and of course (a)(4) and 410(b) must be in lock step.

"What's in the big salad?"

"Big lettuce, big carrots, tomatoes like volleyballs."

Posted
remain in a frozen state like Ted Williams.

The Spendid Icicle?

The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use