JRG Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 We are working on a plan in which a participant who left the company 20+ years ago never began receiving his monthly pension benefit. He was originally due a $500/month life annuity. He is now 75 and has missed 10 years of payments (and also RMDs). Do we have to actuarially increase his benefit? Or can we calculate the amount of the missed payments (+ interest) and make a payment to him in that amount and begin the $500/month annuity?
SoCalActuary Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 You should check your plan document, since the 401(a)(9) RMD rules would indicate that you must give actuarial equivalent increases if the participant remained employed. Alternatively, you might need to deal with retroactive annuity starting date issues here. You might have 5 years of retroactive payments to consider, but also watch out for 415 limits.
Andy the Actuary Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 Notwithstanding SCA's comments, it would seem you cannot forfeit the payments from 65-75. Different attornies handle this in different ways. My preference is to amend the plan to provide for a retroactive annuity start date. This, however, can create another problem if benefit restrictions apply since the retroactive payments, including interest, would be considered to be a lump sum. The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
JRG Posted March 10, 2010 Author Posted March 10, 2010 Thanks for the replies, in terms actuarially increasing the benefit if a participant remains employed, this participant has not been employed since the late 1980s...would this alter the analysis if the plan provides actuarial increases for those that remain employed?
Andy the Actuary Posted March 10, 2010 Posted March 10, 2010 The caution is that actuarially increasing benefits is far from the same as making the missed payments -- in your case, 10 years of back payments that the participant should have received. The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now