Andy the Actuary Posted May 25, 2010 Posted May 25, 2010 The 2009 MRC for a calendar year plan was $20,000. On January 1, 2010 election was made to apply $20,000 of the FSCOB to cover 2010 quarterly contributions of $5,000 each. In July 2010, the valuation is performed and it is determined the 2010 MRC is $0. So, what happens to election? Is approximately $20,000 of FSCOB effectively burned, or is $0 burned since there were no quarterly contributions due for 2010? It would seem that in establishing such an election the appropriate wording would be to state "to the extent required." I presume this is doable since I took the quote directly from the reg.? The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
Mike Preston Posted May 26, 2010 Posted May 26, 2010 Let's start with one overriding principle: there is no such thing as an election to apply $X of the FSCOB or the PFB to cover quarterly contributions. There is, however, an election to apply $X of the FSCOB or the PFB to reduce the RMC. So, your question is modified to: "On January 1, 2010 election was made to apply $20,000 of the FSCOB to reduce the RMC. In July 2010, the valuation is performed and it is determined the 2010 MRC is $0. So, what happens to election?" Now is the language from the reg clear on what happens?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now